From this week's New Yorker.
And the superego theory, of course, is the theory that diaries are really written for the eyes of others. They are exercises in self-justification. When we describe the day?€™s events and our management of them, we have in mind a wise and benevolent reader who will someday see that we played, on the whole, and despite the best efforts of selfish and unworthy colleagues and relations, a creditable game with the hand we were dealt.
I guess this is the kind of diarist I am. My journal is largely composed of letters never sent (which reminds me of a guy I used to know with the cheesy IM handle "letterneversent"). Sometimes I guess I meant to send them and/or finish them, but mostly they're drafts of something I hope to get right later. On the occasion that one gets out the door, I sometimes wish I could keep a copy. Hm, maybe that discounts my diagnosis of the superego theory.
I read once that Don DeLillo makes copies of all his letters before he sends them off to his postmodern friends. I guess that's a good idea if you think your recipient may take your words out of context in the hopes that you can't remember what you wrote. Controversial subjects shouldn't be resolved in letter form anyway.
KATIE BLOGS AGAIN!!
Comments (2)
Definitely self-justification, but also cathartic.
I think the wise and benevolent reader I'm thinking of is me years later. I recently read some journal entries from about 5-7 years back and was completely mortified at how much of an idiot I was. My reading of the situation was completely different than it would be now.
Posted by Liz | June 23, 2008 11:21 AM
Posted on June 23, 2008 11:21
Finally an outstanding writing about the topic, maintain the great work and thus I wish to learn even more of your stuff in the near future.
Posted by Lidsay | September 13, 2010 3:36 AM
Posted on September 13, 2010 03:36